Skip navigation

Category Archives: interview

rachel maddow, out magazine

“Things are moving, so there’s an unpredictability that makes covering the news very exciting,” says Rachel Maddow, whose nightly MSNBC show is appointment TV for anyone even halfway interested in the surreal theater of American politics amid the surging tide of anti-Washington sentiment. Maddow, a wry, mischievous counterweight to the brawling style of her rivals on Fox, is proof that not all political debate has to be reduced to schoolyard taunts, perhaps because she’s more interested in the concept of change. She’s described herself as having been “a weird, depressive little kid” who thought she might grow up to be an Olympic athlete. Instead, thanks to a series of injuries, she found herself engaged in a different kind of sport—politics. The trigger was AIDS. Growing up in the Bay Area in the late l980s, Maddow was galvanized by the unfolding tragedy and inspired by the philosophy of AIDS activism. “I came up in that movement, in which there’s not only a sense of community, but people frantically trying to document their community that is dying, that is disappearing, and trying to make the country understand the importance of what was being lost,” she says. “It gave me a more nuanced appreciation of which political tactics work and which don’t that I wouldn’t otherwise have.”

Read the rest of the Out 100, here.

awesome interview done for ‘the feministing five’ feature. an excerpt:

CA: You’re going to a desert island, and you’re allowed to take one food, one drink and one feminist. I should let you know that many people who I’ve interviewed have said that they would take you to the desert island. What would you pick?

RM: The feminist is easy: I’d take my girlfriend. I would be useless on a desert island. If bringing me is because you would like to survive on the island, I am a bad choice, because I am useless. Susan, however, my partner, is great. She’s totally MacGuyver. She can make a nuclear bomb out of a match and a palm frond. I would bring some sort of mezze platter, because I would love to have a lot of different things so I would not get bored. And for drink, I would bring scotch, but that wouldn’t be fair because Susan doesn’t like scotch. So I’d bring Cuban rum – we both like that.

read the whole thing here.

… over at the HuffPo, entitled the Incredible Rachelness of Maddow. Here’s an extract:

Somehow, Rachel – without pretense, without hectoring people (like her shrill male colleagues at MSNBC), without arousing defenses – gets what she wants. She presents concise, well-informed questions that people try to answer. If they don’t, she persists. When they do answer, as was the case with Rand Paul, they often get into trouble. But they don’t realize it at first, given Rachel’s pleasant, non-invasive, non-gloating, manner. She penetrates without puncturing.

I could make a quip here about how lesbians are very good at that, but that would be lowering the tone, no doubt.

You can read the whole story here.

rachel maddow, richard holbrooke
With Richard Holbrooke. July 13, 2010.

With Richard Holbrooke. July 13, 2010.

this was the web extra video posted at the MSNBC Meet the Press site

There’s a new interview with Rachel up at Fox Business, by Jon Friedman and, for a Fox production, it’s pretty friendly. Here’s an extract:

This is the rare 21st-century TV news star, an un-selfabsorbed celebrity.

Maddow, 37, is the voice of reason at MSNBC. Notable for their verbal brawn, the hosts of cable news shows often behave on air as if they’re competing for a gold medal in preening.

Maddow gets her point across in a restrained but emphatic way. She doesn’t feel a need to outshout her guests.

The tone is unique. Maddow says she presents “essays, which have a thesis, facts, analysis and conclusions. That way, I think, I don’t invite pounding on the table or yelling at people.”

It takes a certain amount of self-confidence to stand apart.

“I’m in my wheelhouse,” she said. “I’m not reading a script written by someone else. If I do an interview with an author, I have read the book. If I interview an actor, I have seen the movie. I enjoy what I do. I don’t think about the audience — it’s not, ‘Oh, my God, a million people are watching.”

You can read the whole thing here.

this, from 2005, pre-TRMS. by Alix Olson of Velvet Park. an extract:

RM: Yeah, I lived in London with the Trannie photographer, and had a bar life… crazy, like Shane on The L Word.

Vp: Did you leave a trail of broken hearts like Shane?

RM: No, a trail of happy hearts, hopefully! Then I decided the only way to finish my dissertation was to live somewhere I’d be unhappy so I could focus. It was between living in an Orange County, CA room of one of my dad’s Air Force friends or moving to the Massachusetts countryside. Finally, I moved into a hovel in Northampton with a friend, where we lived like monks and our apartment was full of skunk cabbage. Our heating system was an open flame in one room and we had to sleep in hats. I finished my dissertation.

you can read the whole thing here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.